Amazon Athena VS Amazon Redshift

  1. Architecture & Processing Model

  • Athena:

    • Serverless query service

    • Built on Presto/Trino

    • No infrastructure to manage

    • Pay per query/data scanned

  • Redshift:

    • Provisioned data warehouse cluster

    • Requires cluster management

    • Dedicated computing resources

    • Pay for running clusters

  1. Data Storage

  • Athena:

    • Queries data directly from S3

    • No data loading required

    • Data remains in S3

  • Redshift:

    • Stores data on managed storage

    • Requires data loading

    • Data copied into Redshift storage

  1. Use Cases

  • Athena:

    • Ad-hoc queries

    • Sporadic/intermittent analysis

    • Quick data exploration

    • Simple ETL jobs

  • Redshift:

    • Complex queries

    • Regular reporting

    • Heavy data transformation

    • Business intelligence applications

    • Enterprise data warehousing

  1. Performance

  • Athena:

    • Better for occasional queries

    • Performance depends on S3 data organization

    • Columnar formats (Parquet/ORC) improve speed

  • Redshift:

    • Better for frequent, complex queries

    • Optimized for high performance

    • Uses distribution keys and sorting keys

    • Maintains statistics and indexes

  1. Cost Model

  • Athena:

    • Pay per TB of data scanned

    • No upfront costs

    • Cost increases with query complexity and data size

  • Redshift:

    • Pay for compute nodes hourly

    • Reserved instances available

    • Predictable costs for consistent workloads

  1. Query Optimization

  • Athena:

    • Limited optimization options

    • Relies on data organization in S3

    • Partitioning and file format choices

  • Redshift:

    • Advanced optimization features

    • Distribution styles

    • Sort keys

    • Compression encoding

    • Vacuum operations

  1. Concurrency

  • Athena:

    • Limited concurrent queries

    • Best for lower concurrency needs

  • Redshift:

    • High concurrency capability

    • Workload Management (WLM)

    • Concurrency scaling

  1. Data Freshness

  • Athena:

    • Real-time access to S3 data

    • No data loading lag

  • Redshift:

    • Requires data loading

    • Potential delay in data availability

  1. Integration

  • Athena:

    • Native S3 integration

    • Works with AWS Glue catalog

    • Easy Lambda integration

  • Redshift:

    • Broader AWS service integration

    • Redshift Spectrum for S3 data

    • Advanced ETL capabilities

Choose Athena when:

  • You need ad-hoc querying

  • Have irregular/unpredictable workloads

  • Want minimal management overhead

  • Data already exists in S3

  • Cost-sensitivity to infrastructure

Choose Redshift when:

  • You need complex query performance

  • Have predictable, heavy workloads

  • Require high concurrency

  • Need advanced optimization features

  • Building an enterprise data warehouse

Last updated

Was this helpful?