Amazon Athena VS Amazon Redshift
Architecture & Processing Model
Athena:
Serverless query service
Built on Presto/Trino
No infrastructure to manage
Pay per query/data scanned
Redshift:
Provisioned data warehouse cluster
Requires cluster management
Dedicated computing resources
Pay for running clusters
Data Storage
Athena:
Queries data directly from S3
No data loading required
Data remains in S3
Redshift:
Stores data on managed storage
Requires data loading
Data copied into Redshift storage
Use Cases
Athena:
Ad-hoc queries
Sporadic/intermittent analysis
Quick data exploration
Simple ETL jobs
Redshift:
Complex queries
Regular reporting
Heavy data transformation
Business intelligence applications
Enterprise data warehousing
Performance
Athena:
Better for occasional queries
Performance depends on S3 data organization
Columnar formats (Parquet/ORC) improve speed
Redshift:
Better for frequent, complex queries
Optimized for high performance
Uses distribution keys and sorting keys
Maintains statistics and indexes
Cost Model
Athena:
Pay per TB of data scanned
No upfront costs
Cost increases with query complexity and data size
Redshift:
Pay for compute nodes hourly
Reserved instances available
Predictable costs for consistent workloads
Query Optimization
Athena:
Limited optimization options
Relies on data organization in S3
Partitioning and file format choices
Redshift:
Advanced optimization features
Distribution styles
Sort keys
Compression encoding
Vacuum operations
Concurrency
Athena:
Limited concurrent queries
Best for lower concurrency needs
Redshift:
High concurrency capability
Workload Management (WLM)
Concurrency scaling
Data Freshness
Athena:
Real-time access to S3 data
No data loading lag
Redshift:
Requires data loading
Potential delay in data availability
Integration
Athena:
Native S3 integration
Works with AWS Glue catalog
Easy Lambda integration
Redshift:
Broader AWS service integration
Redshift Spectrum for S3 data
Advanced ETL capabilities
Choose Athena when:
You need ad-hoc querying
Have irregular/unpredictable workloads
Want minimal management overhead
Data already exists in S3
Cost-sensitivity to infrastructure
Choose Redshift when:
You need complex query performance
Have predictable, heavy workloads
Require high concurrency
Need advanced optimization features
Building an enterprise data warehouse
Last updated
Was this helpful?