SNS & outbox pattern
SNS by itself does not automatically implement or replace the outbox pattern, though it can be part of an outbox pattern implementation.
Here's why:
The Outbox Pattern's Purpose:
Ensures data consistency between database transactions and message publishing
Maintains exactly-once message delivery semantics
Preserves message ordering when needed
Provides recovery capabilities after system failures
SNS Characteristics:
Provides at-least-once delivery guarantee
Doesn't participate in database transactions
Messages sent to SNS are independent of your database state
Can't roll back a message once published
Key Issue: The fundamental problem the outbox pattern solves is the atomic consistency between database changes and message publishing. SNS doesn't provide transactional guarantees with your database operations. For example:
Common Scenarios Where Outbox Is Still Needed with SNS:
Alternative Approaches:
Using DynamoDB Streams or RDS Event Notifications
Change Data Capture (CDC) patterns
Event sourcing with event stores
Using Amazon EventBridge with reliable message delivery patterns
However, there are some specific cases where you might not need an outbox pattern even when using SNS:
When eventual consistency is acceptable
When duplicate messages can be handled by consumers
When message loss is tolerable
In simple workflows where transactional consistency isn't critical
The key is understanding your system's requirements around:
Data consistency
Message delivery guarantees
Recovery capabilities
Message ordering requirements
If any of these are critical to your system, you'll likely still need to implement an outbox pattern or similar mechanism, even when using SNS as your messaging infrastructure.
Last updated
Was this helpful?