Cross-regions failover
Route 53 is better when:
DNS-based failover is acceptable
You need domain-based routing
Cost is a primary concern
Simple configuration is preferred
Health checks can be slower (30+ seconds)
Global Accelerator is better when:
You need fast failover (<30 seconds)
Static IP addresses are required
You want to optimize network path to applications
TCP/UDP traffic optimization is important
Client-IP preservation is needed
Network latency is critical
For most regional failover scenarios, Route 53 is sufficient unless you specifically need Global Accelerator's features like fast failover or static IPs.
Key cross-regional failover mechanisms in AWS:
S3 Cross-Region Replication (CRR)
Automatically replicates objects to backup region
Asynchronous replication with versioning
Aurora Global Database
Sub-second replication across regions
Promotes secondary region in <1 minute
Managed failover process
DynamoDB Global Tables
Multi-master, multi-region replication
Active-active configuration
Sub-second replication
EC2 Auto Recovery
Monitors instance health
Automatically recovers to new hardware
Preserves instance ID and metadata
Elastic Disaster Recovery (DRS)
Continuous replication of servers
Sub-second RPO
Automated failover testing
RDS Cross-Region Read Replicas
Asynchronous replication
Manual promotion to master
Read scaling in secondary region
CloudFront with Origin Failover
Automatic failover to backup origin
Based on origin health checks
No DNS propagation delay
Last updated
Was this helpful?