Cross-regions failover

Route 53 is better when:

  • DNS-based failover is acceptable

  • You need domain-based routing

  • Cost is a primary concern

  • Simple configuration is preferred

  • Health checks can be slower (30+ seconds)

Global Accelerator is better when:

  • You need fast failover (<30 seconds)

  • Static IP addresses are required

  • You want to optimize network path to applications

  • TCP/UDP traffic optimization is important

  • Client-IP preservation is needed

  • Network latency is critical

For most regional failover scenarios, Route 53 is sufficient unless you specifically need Global Accelerator's features like fast failover or static IPs.

Key cross-regional failover mechanisms in AWS:

  1. S3 Cross-Region Replication (CRR)

  • Automatically replicates objects to backup region

  • Asynchronous replication with versioning

  1. Aurora Global Database

  • Sub-second replication across regions

  • Promotes secondary region in <1 minute

  • Managed failover process

  1. DynamoDB Global Tables

  • Multi-master, multi-region replication

  • Active-active configuration

  • Sub-second replication

  1. EC2 Auto Recovery

  • Monitors instance health

  • Automatically recovers to new hardware

  • Preserves instance ID and metadata

  1. Elastic Disaster Recovery (DRS)

  • Continuous replication of servers

  • Sub-second RPO

  • Automated failover testing

  1. RDS Cross-Region Read Replicas

  • Asynchronous replication

  • Manual promotion to master

  • Read scaling in secondary region

  1. CloudFront with Origin Failover

  • Automatic failover to backup origin

  • Based on origin health checks

  • No DNS propagation delay

Last updated

Was this helpful?