Lambda@Edge and CloudFront Functions
Here's a comprehensive comparison between Lambda@Edge and CloudFront Functions:
Runtime Environment:
Lambda@Edge: Node.js and Python
CloudFront Functions: JavaScript only (ECMAScript 5.1)
Execution Context:
Lambda@Edge: Can run at four stages:
Viewer Request
Origin Request
Origin Response
Viewer Response
CloudFront Functions: Only two stages:
Viewer Request
Viewer Response
Performance & Scale:
Lambda@Edge:
Startup latency: ~1-2ms
Maximum runtime: 5-30 seconds
Memory: 128MB to 10GB
CloudFront Functions:
Startup latency: sub-millisecond
Maximum runtime: < 1ms
Memory: 2MB
Use Cases: Lambda@Edge:
Complex processing
Third-party API calls
Large-scale manipulations
Access to AWS services
Cookie manipulation
Complex redirects
Authentication/Authorization
CloudFront Functions:
URL rewrites/redirects
Header manipulation
Simple A/B testing
Request normalization
Simple authentication
Cache key normalization
Request validation
Pricing:
Lambda@Edge: Pay for compute time and requests
CloudFront Functions: Significantly cheaper, pay per request only
Development & Deployment: Lambda@Edge:
CloudFront Functions:
Key Limitations: Lambda@Edge:
Regional deployment required
Longer cold starts
Higher latency for complex operations
CloudFront Functions:
No external network calls
Limited runtime
No filesystem access
No access to additional AWS services
Choose CloudFront Functions when:
You need simple, lightweight processing
Sub-millisecond performance is crucial
Cost optimization is important
Processing is limited to viewer request/response
Choose Lambda@Edge when:
You need complex processing
External API calls are required
You need access to AWS services
Processing at origin request/response is needed
Last updated
Was this helpful?