Transit VPC VS Transit Gateway
While you can use a Transit VPC (also known as a hub-and-spoke VPC), Transit Gateway is generally the recommended modern approach. Here's why:
Transit VPC Approach:
Requires running and managing EC2 instances as software routers/VPN endpoints
More complex to maintain and scale
Higher operational overhead (patching, updates, monitoring)
More expensive due to EC2 instance costs
Limited bandwidth based on EC2 instance types
Requires manual route table management
More complex network architecture
Transit Gateway Benefits:
Fully managed AWS service
Simpler architecture and easier to maintain
Automatic scaling without managing infrastructure
Support for thousands of VPCs
Higher bandwidth (up to 50 Gbps per VPC connection)
Centralized route management
Built-in monitoring and metrics
Support for multiple routing tables
Direct Connect integration
Multicast support
Inter-region peering capability
The main reason to still consider Transit VPC would be:
If you have specific routing requirements that Transit Gateway doesn't support
If you need complete control over the routing infrastructure
If you're heavily invested in an existing Transit VPC setup that works well
However, for new implementations, Transit Gateway is almost always the better choice due to its simplicity, scalability, and lower operational overhead.
You can use AWS Transit Gateway to connect to third-party cloud providers through several methods:
Site-to-Site VPN:
Set up a VPN connection between Transit Gateway and the third-party cloud
Supports IPsec VPN connections
Can connect to providers like:
Google Cloud Platform (GCP)
Microsoft Azure
Oracle Cloud
IBM Cloud
Transit Gateway Connect:
Enables attachment of third-party SD-WAN/virtual appliances
Provides higher bandwidth and lower latency than VPN
Supports network transformations and advanced routing
Direct Connect:
Use Transit Gateway with Direct Connect for private connectivity
Can connect through Direct Connect partners that have presence in multiple clouds
Provides more reliable and consistent network performance
Key Considerations:
Need to ensure compatible routing protocols
Must plan IP address spaces carefully to avoid overlaps
Consider bandwidth requirements and costs
Security groups and Network ACLs need to be properly configured
Latency implications based on regions and connection types
Limitations:
Cross-region routing may incur additional costs
Some advanced features might not be available across different providers
Need to manage different authentication mechanisms
Bandwidth limitations vary by connection type
For production environments, it's common to use a combination of VPN and Direct Connect for redundancy and optimal performance.
Last updated
Was this helpful?